Finally, we see some important changes in dealing with Paternity Fraud taking place in Australia after the terrible injustice meted in Liam Magill’s case. Here is the link to news item – Fathers Demand Mandatory Paternity Testing
Here is my commentary on the article -
A men’s rights group has called for mandatory paternity testing of all babies after government figures revealed almost 600 instances of men compelled to financially support children they did not father.
Only 600! I bet there are ten times that figure paternity fraud is taking place. For every 1 intelligent man obtaining a paternity test, there are 9 suckers out there who believe their whore wives to be paragons of virtue.
Since changes to child support laws four years ago, there had been 586 cases of men successfully using DNA testing to show they were not biologically related to children they had been financially supporting, the federal government has revealed to The Australian.
Ah! Now I see, these 600 suckers were forced by the child support system to support bastard children born of paternity fraud. This is by no means the actual representative figure for the paternity fraud committed by whores.
In the overwhelming majority of these cases, the courts have not forced mothers to pay back the money they have received.
Why would they? It is the hard earned money of a “man”. At least the fact that it is mentioned is something.
Of the 586 cases, only 74 mothers have been told to pay back the money. Those reparations total in excess of $533,000.
If only 74 mothers were told to pay back in excess of half million dollars, if you combine the arrears from all the 600 sluts, it should probably run into millions. This is the amount they were told to repay. What does this sum include? Does it compensate for all the resources the man must have invested in the whore while she is carrying the bastard child of some other man? Does it compensate for the emotional trauma the paternity fraud inflicted on the man?
The figures, from the government’s Child Support Agency, prompted Men’s Rights Agency director Sue Price to call for mandatory DNA testing at birth.
“Quite a lot of them (the men) don’t get their money back,” she said. “The mothers aren’t working anyway, so there’s no way of getting the money back.”
Bloody parasites!
The figures are likely to renew a fierce debate over the use of DNA to determine biological parentage after birth.
Why the f is there a fierce debate? Either a man is the biological father or he is not! The fierce debate is in the minds of sluts who want to protect the financial interests of the other sluts. It has nothing to do with the best interests of the child. If indeed it was, they would advocate for making the genetic connections of the child public and make the real biological father pay for the upkeep of his illegitimate child.
Sole Parents Union president Kathleen Swinbourne told The Australian that the 2007 law change that led to the explosion in DNA testing was hurting children who were being told their fathers did not want to continue playing the role of parent. She urged uncertain fathers to seek testing during the pregnancy.
“We think there is more to being a father than DNA,” she said. “If men are asking for these tests right at the beginning when someone says they are pregnant, that’s fine, but if you are doing this when they are already calling you daddy, what effect does that have on the child?
Who the F are you to dictate “there is more to being a father than DNA”. Is there? If it was, it was for the man in question to determine. And for no one else. If a man wants to play father after obtaining the knowledge of paternity fraud, all power to him. Noble soul he may be. For all others, there are other more deserving children world over that deserve the compassion and generosity of fellow humans. Not the bastard child of paternity fraud. Let the child suffer the consequences, if any, of the crimes committed by its parents. Like the children of any other sundry criminal.
“If you have accepted that you are their father, should you be allowed to turn around and change your mind based on biology?”
Hell, Yes. If you are duped into believing in something based on fraud, lies and misrepresentation, then once the fraud is exposed, you, as the victim, have every right to “turn around” and proclaim all the assertions, benefits born of that fraud are null and void. In such a weighty issue as paternity, it is all the more important that we set right the wrong no matter what the time period is. If there is a man who out of compassion does not want to change his mind based on biology, all glory to him. But no one should force the mantle of fatherhood or the financial obligations that go with it, on the duped, non-biological father.
She suggested men make inquiries early to ensure children do not become traumatised by the DNA checking process.
“If you’re in doubt, check it early,” she said. “Take it out on your ex, don’t take it out on your children.”
Ms Price said she believed that up to 30 per cent of men who had a test found they were not the father.
“I think there should be mandatory testing at birth of every child to stop this happening,” she said.
Finally, there is something that I am in violent agreement with J
“People have affairs — that happens — but it’s your obligation to find out who the father is.”
A spokesman for Human Services Minister Tanya Plibersek said it was important that the children of separated parents were supported, both financially and emotionally.
“The Family Court adjudicates in disputes over who the actual parents are,” he said.
“The Child Support Agency simply facilitates payments in the minority of cases where parents can’t come to private arrangements.”
Tags: adultery, australia paternity fraud, betrayal, DNA Test, illegitimacy, india adultery cases
February 26, 2011 at 6:10 am |
DNA paternity testing should be mandatorily followed if one of the parents so demands
This becomes all the more compelling as innocent persons are being targetted by unscrupulous persons who lay claim to be biological children and thereby claim huge ancestral properties – to obtain which they may even have used foul means to send their alleged parents to a premature demise.